Victoria's Secret's Parent Co. and Execs Misled Investors About

Victoria’s Secret’s parent company is facing legal action – not for the bra and underwear designs it is being called out for swiping from ex-employee Jennifer Zuccarini’s label Fleur du Mal – but instead, for allegedly violating federal securities laws by making “materially false and misleading statements and/or failing to disclose adverse information regarding L Brands’ business and prospects,” thereby, causing investors to pay “artificially inflated prices for L Brands common stock,” only to have stock prices fall late last year, and throughout this year, as well. 

US charges Boeing with misleading investors on 737 MAX

Victoria's Secret ditches prioritizing wokeness over 'sexiness

Victoria's Secret Owner Cancels Sycamore Sale, LB Stock Sinks

74: Women's relationship to money, budgeting vs investing and

Fashion Law in 2019: 11 of the Year's Most Noteworthy Lawsuits - The Fashion Law

The Victoria's Secret Contract That Anticipated a Pandemic - The

Victoria's Secret ditches wokeness over sexiness after sales drop

Cineplex facing proposed class-action lawsuits in Canada

Trump's US$5 billion Truth Social deal greenlit by investors

Victoria's Secret ditches wokeness over sexiness after sales drop

These charts show why Victoria's Secret fired its angels — and why

Victoria's Secret Parent Company's Stock Jumps on Updated

Aurelius renews feud over Victora's Secret owner Sycamore's $1

These Influencers Aren't Flesh and Blood, Yet Millions Follow Them

Montreal exec. committee president steps down after investigation